A couple of days ago the German Federal Court of Justice has handed down an interesting decision regarding the question whether an individual may demand that his name be deleted from press articles in publicly available online newspaper archives, if the matter reported is long in the past and no longer currently relevant (Bundesgerichtshof, Urteil vom 30. Oktober 2012, Az. VI ZR 4/12).
The Federal Court of Justice has now decided that in a situation like this, at least in this particular case, the freedom of information and the freedom of the press prevail over the individual’s rights. If the reporting as such was permitted and within the bounds of law at the time of the initial report, and the item can still be considered relevant for current informational purposes, then archiving the report in its unaltered form, retaining the full name of the persons involved, can be considered legal. So, the manager lost the case and will have to live with the fact that his name will continue to be found in conjunction with past investigations.
While publicity may be a good thing for artists, actors and other protagonists of modern life, on certain occasions it may also be quite embarrassing or even detrimental to one’s reputation. German law allows for a number of effective remedies against inappropriate or even defamatory news reporting, libel and slander. On the other hand, the freedom of information and the freedom of the press are constitutional rights in Germany as well, and in this case, the German Federal Court of Justice has asserted these principles once again.
Interestingly enough, the court itself meticulously avoids to give the manager’s name in its own published decision…
If you have any questions please feel free to contact:
Date: January 2013